Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Prostrakan, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., No. 19-1125 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1125
Decided
December 11, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PROSTRAKAN, INC., STRAKAN INTERNATIONAL

S.A.R.L.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

ACTAVIS LABORATORIES UT, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

2019-1125

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:16-cv-00044-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

JUDGMENT

BARRY P. GOLOB, Cozen O'Connor, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by WILLIAM BLAKE COBLENTZ, AARON S. LUKAS, KERRY BRENDAN MCTIGUE.

GARY EDWARD HOOD, Polsinelli PC, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by MARK THOMAS DEMING; JASON WIETJES, Dallas, TX.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, TARANTO and

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 11, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Prostrakan, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., No. 19-1125 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1125-20191211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1125-20191211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error