Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 19-1043 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 21, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1043
Decided
January 21, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VIRNETX INC.,

Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellee

2019-1043

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,746.

JUDGMENT

STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS, IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, MICHAEL WOLFE, DANIEL ZEILBERGER.

ANDREW S. EHMKE, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L. MCCOMBS, THEODORE M. FOSTER, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 21, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 19-1043 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 21, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1043-20200121
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1043-20200121

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.