Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Halozyme, Inc. v. Iancu, No. 19-1011 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1011
Decided
January 13, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

HALOZYME, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1011

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:16-cv-01580-CMHJFA, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MANDY H. KIM, Irvine, CA; SAMI SEDGHANI, San Francisco, CA; PAUL WHITFIELD HUGHES, JOSHUA DAVID ROGACZEWSKI, Washington, DC. FRANCES LYNCH, Office of the Solicitor, United States

2Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, AMY J. NELSON; JAYNIE RANDALL LILLEY, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 13, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Halozyme, Inc. v. Iancu, No. 19-1011 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1011-20200113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1011-20200113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.