Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Zito LLC v. CRJ, Inc., No. 19-1009 (Fed. Cir. July 12, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1009
Decided
July 12, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ZITO LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CRJ, INC., RIPKEN BASEBALL CAMPS & CLINICS

LLC, RIPKEN HOLDINGS LLC, RIPKEN

BASEBALL ACADEMY LLC, RIPKEN

ENTERPRISES LLC, R-C MYRTLE BEACH LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

2019-1009

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in No. 1:17-cv-01733-JKB, Judge James K. Bredar.

JUDGMENT

JAMES K. ARCHIBALD, Wright, Constable & Skeen, LLP, Baltimore, MD, argued for plaintiff-appellant. WILLIAM MANDIR, Sughrue Mion PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by JOHN F. RABENA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 12, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Zito LLC v. CRJ, Inc., No. 19-1009 (Fed. Cir. July 12, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1009-20190712
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1009-20190712

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.