Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Customedia Technologies, LLC v. Dish Network Corporation, No. 19-1001 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1001
Decided
November 8, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CUSTOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK

LLC,

Appellees

2019-1001

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2017-00019.

JUDGMENT

RAYMOND WILLIAM MORT, III, The Mort Law Firm, PLLC, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS, Baker Botts LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by GEORGE HOPKINS GUY, III; ALI DHANANI, MICHAEL HAWES, Houston, TX.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Customedia Technologies, LLC v. Dish Network Corporation, No. 19-1001 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1001-20191108
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1001-20191108

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error