Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics, No. 18-2380 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2380
Decided
November 13, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP.,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant

2018-2380, 2018-2381

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:14-cv-02061-H-BGS, Senior Judge Marilyn L. Huff.

JUDGMENT

GREGORY F. AHRENS, Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP, Cincinnati, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by BRETT A. SCHATZ. RONALD E. CAHILL, Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by HEATHER B. REPICKY; PETER F. SNELL, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., New York, NY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 13, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics, No. 18-2380 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2380-20191113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2380-20191113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.