Fed. Cir.

Freebit as v. Bose Corporation, No. 18-2365 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2019)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 18-2365
Decided: October 8, 2019
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FREEBIT AS,

Appellant

BOSE CORPORATION,

Appellee

2018-2365, 2018-2366

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-00129, IPR2017-00130.

JUDGMENT

TIA FENTON, Oblon LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILBUR T. BAKER, LISA MANDRUSIAK.

ANDREW KOPSIDAS, Fish & Richardson, PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER DRYER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Freebit as v. Bose Corporation, No. 18-2365 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2019).

Record ID: CAFC-18-2365-20191008
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2365-20191008

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error