Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Genzyme Corporation v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA), No. 18-2362 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2362
Decided
August 16, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GENZYME CORPORATION, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S.,

LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

2018-2362

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:16-cv-00540-KAJ, Circuit Judge Kent A. Jordan.

JUDGMENT

PAUL HENRY BERGHOFF, McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by ALISON JAMEEN BALDWIN, NATHANIEL PAUL CHONGSIRIWATANA, DANIEL F. GELWICKS, NICOLE E. GRIMM, JAMES LEE LOVSIN, JEREMY E. NOE, KURT WILLIAM ROHDE; JEFFREY B. BOVE, Ratner Prestia, Wilmington, DE. CHAD A. LANDMON, Axinn Veltrop Harkrider, LLP,

2Hartford, CT, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by DAVID KEELER LUDWIG, EDWARD M. MATHIAS; DAN-FENG MEI, New York, NY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 16, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Genzyme Corporation v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA), No. 18-2362 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2362-20190816
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2362-20190816

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.