Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Grant, No. 18-2355 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 10, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2355
Decided
September 10, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: GAVIN GRANT, DAVID MAJOR, JASON

GERHARD, JOSE TORERO, GRANT SCHOLES,

PAOLO PIRONI, CHRISTINE SWITZER,

Appellants 2018-2355

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/457,047.

JUDGMENT

BRUCE D. SUNSTEIN, Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellants. ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, COKE MORGAN STEWART, MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 10, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Grant, No. 18-2355 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 10, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2355-20190910
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2355-20190910

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.