Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Flamm v. Micron Technology, Inc., No. 18-2322 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 6, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2322
Decided
September 6, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

DANIEL L. FLAMM,

Appellant

v.

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., INTEL

CORPORATION, GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC.,

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD.,

Appellees

2018-2322

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-00391, IPR2017-01746.

JUDGMENT

ROLF STADHEIM, Stadheim & Grear, Scottsdale, AZ, argued for appellant. MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees Micron Technology, Inc., Intel Corporation, GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., Inc. Appellee Micron Technology, Inc. also represented by JARED BOBROW, JEREMY JASON LANG, Menlo

2Park, CA. CHAD S. CAMPBELL, Perkins Coie LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for appellee Intel Corporation. Also represented by TYLER R. BOWEN; DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH; PHILIP ALCIDE MORIN, San Diego, CA; JONATHAN L. MCFARLAND, Seattle, WA.

SHAMITA ETIENNE-CUMMINGS, White & Case LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., Inc. Also represented by DAVID TENNANT. NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 6, 2019 /s /Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Flamm v. Micron Technology, Inc., No. 18-2322 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 6, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2322-20190906
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2322-20190906

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.