Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Triplay, Inc. v. Whatsapp, Inc., No. 18-2265 (Fed. Cir. June 21, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2265
Decided
June 21, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TRIPLAY, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

TRIPLAY, LTD.,

Plaintiff

v.

WHATSAPP, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2018-2265

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:13-cv-01703-LPS, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark.

JUDGMENT

DOUGLAS R. WEIDER, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Florham Park, NJ, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL ANTHONY NICODEMA. GABRIEL BELL, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by

2DOUGLAS ETHAN LUMISH, RICHARD GREGORY FRENKEL, Menlo Park, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 21, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Triplay, Inc. v. Whatsapp, Inc., No. 18-2265 (Fed. Cir. June 21, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2265-20190621
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2265-20190621

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error