Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. Intel Corporation, No. 18-2248 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2248
Decided
October 4, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

X2Y ATTENUATORS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

APPLE INC., HP INC., HEWLETT-PACKARD

ENTERPRISE COMPANY,

Defendants

2018-2248, 2018-2249

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in Nos. 1:11-cv-00117-CB, 1:11-cv-00218-CB, Judge Cathy Bissoon.

JUDGMENT

JOHN JEFFREY EICHMANN, Dovel & Luner, LLP, Santa Monica, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MICHAEL JENNINGS SUMMERSGILL, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by WILLIAM F. LEE,

2REBECCA A. BACT, JORDAN LAWRENCE HIRSCH; S. CALVIN WALDEN, New York, NY; MARK D. SELWYN, Palo Alto, CA; HEATH BROOKS, TODD ZUBLER, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 4, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. Intel Corporation, No. 18-2248 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2248-20191004
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2248-20191004

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error