Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Veritas Technologies LLC v. Realtime Data LLC, No. 18-2200 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 6, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2200
Decided
December 6, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Appellant

v.

REALTIME DATA LLC,

Appellee

2018-2200

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-00179, IPR2017-00808.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT J. GAJARSA, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by GABRIEL BELL; ANN MARIE WAHLS, Chicago, IL; LISA K. NGUYEN, Menlo Park, CA; AMIT MAKKER, San Francisco, CA.

KAYVAN B. NOROOZI, Noroozi PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 6, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Veritas Technologies LLC v. Realtime Data LLC, No. 18-2200 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 6, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2200-20191206
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2200-20191206

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.