Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. BIG Fish Games, Inc., No. 18-2186 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 13, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2186
Decided
September 13, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,

UNILOC 2017 LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

BIG FISH GAMES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2018-2186

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:17-cv-01183-RAJ, Judge Richard A. Jones.

JUDGMENT

JAMES J. FOSTER, Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Boston, MA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by PAUL J. HAYES, AARON JACOBS.

DOUGLAS FRED STEWART, Bracewell LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by TIMOTHY GEIGER, Houston, TX; DAVID JOHN BALL, New York, NY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 13, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. BIG Fish Games, Inc., No. 18-2186 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 13, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2186-20190913
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2186-20190913

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error