DSM Desotech Inc. v. ITC, No. 18-2150 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2019) — Rule 36 Judgment

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

DSM DESOTECH INC., DSM IP ASSETS B.V.,

Appellants

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

OFS FITEL, LLC, MOMENTIVE UV COATINGS

(SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.,

Intervenors

2018-2150

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1031.

JUDGMENT

JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by RAJEEV GUPTA, KARTHIK KUMAR.

RONALD TRAUD, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L.

2BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, MICHELLE W. KLANCNIK. BRADLEY JOHN OLSON, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor OFS Fitel, LLC. Also represented by CHRISTINE JULIET SOHAR HENTER, JORDAN WEINSTEIN.

EDMOND R. BANNON, Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York, NY, argued for intervenor Momentive UV Coatings (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Also represented by AHMED JAMAL DAVIS, Washington, DC; RYAN PATRICK O'CONNOR, San Diego, CA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CLEVENGER, and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 9, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Cite this opinion

DSM Desotech Inc. v. ITC, No. 18-2150 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2019).

Record ID

CAFC-18-2150-20191209

Permalink

https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2150-20191209

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.