Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ecojet, Inc. v. Luraco, Inc., No. 18-2117 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2117
Decided
June 14, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ECOJET, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

LURACO, INC.,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant

2018-2117, 2018-2187

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:16-cv-00487-AG-KES, Judge Andrew J. Guilford.

JUDGMENT

JOHN J. SHAEFFER, Fox Rothschild LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JEFFREY H. GRANT.

WARREN NORRED, Norred Law PLLC, Arlington, TX, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by JULIE S. GOLDEMBERG, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 14, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ecojet, Inc. v. Luraco, Inc., No. 18-2117 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2117-20190614
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2117-20190614

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.