Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Genetic Veterinary Sciences v. Laboklin GmbH & Co. KG, No. 18-2056 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2019)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2056
Decided
August 9, 2019
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GENETIC VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC., DBA

PAW PRINTS GENETICS,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LABOKLIN GMBH & CO. KG, THE UNIVERSITY OF

BERN,

Defendants-Appellants

2018-2056

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 2:17-cv-00108-HCMDEM, Senior Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr.

SUA SPONTE

Before WALLACH, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

Before the court is the parties’ August 6, 2019 joint response to this court’s order to show cause. The parties have2 2 GENETIC VETERINARY SCIENCES v. LABOKLIN GMBH & CO. KG

requested the redaction of certain material that they have identified as confidential business information.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The opinion issued under seal on July 29, 2019 is hereby unsealed in part with the remaining sealed portions modified to omit confidential information from the public opinion. FOR THE COURT

August 9, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Genetic Veterinary Sciences v. Laboklin GmbH & Co. KG, No. 18-2056 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2056-20190809
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2056-20190809

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.