Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Peerless Industries, Inc. v. Crimson AV, LLC, No. 18-2021 (Fed. Cir. June 2, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2021
Decided
June 2, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

CRIMSON AV, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant

VLADIMIR GLEYZER,

Defendant-Appellee

2018-2021, 2019-1332, 2019-1333

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:11-cv-01768, Judge Joan H. Lefkow.

JUDGMENT

JAMES D. DASSO, Foley & Lardner LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also represented by ANDREW GROSS, RICHARD SPENCER MONTEI.

PETER RYNDAK, Johnson & Bell, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellant and defendant-appellee. Also represented by AVA LOUISE CAFFARINI; JACQUES M. DULIN,

2Innovation Law Group, Ltd., Sequim, WA; MILES SUKOVIC, Sukovic Law Group, a P.C., Northfield, IL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 2, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Peerless Industries, Inc. v. Crimson AV, LLC, No. 18-2021 (Fed. Cir. June 2, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-18-2021-20200602
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-2021-20200602

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error