Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Kaneka Corporation v. Xiamen Kingdomway Group Co., No. 18-1892 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1892
Decided
May 13, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KANEKA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

XIAMEN KINGDOMWAY GROUP COMPANY,

PACIFIC RAINBOW INTERNATIONAL INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

MITSUBISHI GAS CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.,

MAYPRO INDUSTRIES, LLC, ZHEJIANG

MEDICINE CO., LTD., ZMC-USA L.L.C., MAYPRO INDUSTRIES, INC., SHENZHOU BIOLOGY AND

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., SOJITZ CORPORATION

OF AMERICA, ROCHEM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendants

2018-1892

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:11-cv-02389-SJO-SS, Senior Judge James S. Otero.

JUDGMENT

2KEITH D. NOWAK, Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM F. SONDERICKER; ROBERT MCGEE BOWICK, JR., Raley & Bowick, LLP, Houston, TX. EDWARD NAIDICH, Mei & Mark LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by RICHARD HADORN, LEI MEI, PHILIP ANDREW RILEY, LAURENCE M. SANDELL.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 13, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kaneka Corporation v. Xiamen Kingdomway Group Co., No. 18-1892 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1892-20190513
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1892-20190513

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.