Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Polaris Innovations Limited v. US, No. 18-1831 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2022)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1831
Decided
December 7, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED,

Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor

2018-1831

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-00116.

JUDGMENT

AZRA HADZIMEHMEDOVIC, Tensegrity Law Group LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMANTHA A. JAMESON, AARON MATTHEW NATHAN; MATTHEW D. POWERS, DANIEL RADKE, Redwood Shores, CA; NATHAN NOBU LOWENSTEIN, KENNETH J. WEATHERWAX, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP, Los Angeles, CA. PETER J. AYERS, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for

2intervenor. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED; COURTNEY DIXON, JOSEPH H. HUNT, SCOTT R. MCINTOSH, MELISSA N. PATTERSON, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 7, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Polaris Innovations Limited v. US, No. 18-1831 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1831-20221207
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1831-20221207

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case