Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Allied Machine & Engineering v. Competitive Carbide, Inc., No. 18-1744 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 10, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1744
Decided
September 10, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ALLIED MACHINE & ENGINEERING

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

COMPETITIVE CARBIDE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

2018-1744

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in No. 1:11-cv-02712-CAB, Judge Christopher A. Boyko.

JUDGMENT

NATHANIEL B. WEBB, Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER RYAN BUTLER, SCOTT OLDHAM. ROBERT W. MCINTYRE, Wegman, Hessler & Vanderburg, Cleveland, OH, argued for defendant-appellant. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 10, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Allied Machine & Engineering v. Competitive Carbide, Inc., No. 18-1744 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 10, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1744-20190910
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1744-20190910

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error