Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Alien Technology, LLC v. Intermec, Inc., No. 18-1727 (Fed. Cir. May 17, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1727
Decided
May 17, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ALIEN TECHNOLOGY, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

INTERMEC, INC., INTERMEC IP CORP.,

INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,

Defendants-Appellants

2018-1727

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota in No. 3:06-cv-00051-DLH-ARS, Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland.

JUDGMENT

TED G. DANE, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH LAUGHTON.

DOUGLAS L. SAWYER, Perkins Coie, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by MARK T. SMITH; DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 17, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alien Technology, LLC v. Intermec, Inc., No. 18-1727 (Fed. Cir. May 17, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1727-20190517
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1727-20190517

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error