Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Konami Gaming Inc. v. High 5 Games, LLC, No. 18-1723 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1723
Decided
March 11, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KONAMI GAMING INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

HIGH 5 GAMES, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2018-1723

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in No. 2:14-cv-01483-RFB-NJK, Judge Richard F. Boulware II.

JUDGMENT

KRISTOPHER K. HULLIBERGER, Howard & Howard Attorneys, PLLC, Royal Oak, MI, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER J. WORREL; PATRICK MICHAEL MCCARTHY, Ann Arbor, MI. ROBERT C. RYAN, Holland & Hart, LLP, Reno, NV, and TEAGUE I. DONAHEY, Boise, ID, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ADAM A. HUBBARD, Boulder, CO; CHRISTOPHER B. HADLEY, JENNIFER L. JUNKIN, Salt Lake City, UT; JONATHAN A. FALLON, High 5 Games, LLC, New

2York, NY. ADAM MORTARA, Bartlit Beck LLP, Chicago, IL, for amicus curiae IGT. Also represented by MEG E. FASULO, DANIEL CHARLES TAYLOR, Denver, CO. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 11, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Konami Gaming Inc. v. High 5 Games, LLC, No. 18-1723 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1723-20190311
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1723-20190311

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.