Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Lilleness, No. 18-1714 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1714
Decided
March 12, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE: ROBERT P. LILLENESS, HAN-SHENG YUH,

WEIDONG WILLIAM WANG, WAYNE SCOTT,

Appellants 2018-1714

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/801,307.

JUDGMENT

JAMES J. LUKAS, JR., Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellants. Also represented by GARY R. JAROSIK, MATTHEW J. LEVINSTEIN, SARA MASON SKULMAN. MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MARY L. KELLY, JOSEPH MATAL.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 12, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Lilleness, No. 18-1714 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1714-20190312
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1714-20190312

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.