Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Engineered Corrosion Solutions v. South-Tek Systems, LLC, No. 18-1685 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1685
Decided
May 9, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ENGINEERED CORROSION SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

SOUTH-TEK SYSTEMS, LLC, POTTER ELECTRIC

CO, LLC,

Appellees

2018-1685

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-01351.

JUDGMENT

BENJAMIN AARON SAIDMAN, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JASON E. STACH. DAVID E. BENNETT, Coats & Bennett, PLLC, Cary, NC, argued for appellees. Also represented by EDWARD H. GREEN, III, BRANDEE WOOLARD.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 9, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Engineered Corrosion Solutions v. South-Tek Systems, LLC, No. 18-1685 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1685-20190509
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1685-20190509

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error