Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

QFO Labs, Inc. v. Parrot S.A., No. 18-1663 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1663
Decided
April 3, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

QFO LABS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

PARROT S.A., PARROT DRONES S.A.S., PARROT,

INC.,

Appellees

2018-1663, 2018-1664

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-01550, IPR2016-01559.

JUDGMENT

BRAD PEDERSEN, Patterson Thuente Pedersen, PA, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by PHILLIP A. COLE, Lommen Abdo, Minneapolis, MN; CHAZ DE LA GARZA, Law Offices of Chaz De La Garza, Minneapolis, MN; CHARLES A. LEMAIRE, Lemaire Patent Law Firm PLLC, Burnsville, MN. MATTHEW A. TRAUPMAN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellees. Also

2represented by JAMES M. GLASS; ARCHITH RAMKUMAR, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and O’MALLEY, Cir-

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 3, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

QFO Labs, Inc. v. Parrot S.A., No. 18-1663 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1663-20190403
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1663-20190403

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error