Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

IP Co., LLC. v. Emerson Electric Co., No. 18-1636 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1636
Decided
May 9, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IP CO., LLC.,

Appellant

v.

EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.,

Appellee

2018-1636

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-01602.

JUDGMENT

GREGORY J. GONSALVES, Gonsalves Law Firm, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES R. BARNEY, KELLY LU, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC. JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER; DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Washington, DC.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (TARANTO, SCHALL, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 9, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

IP Co., LLC. v. Emerson Electric Co., No. 18-1636 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1636-20190509
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1636-20190509

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error