Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Focal IP, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 18-1627 (Fed. Cir. June 20, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1627
Decided
June 20, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
4 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FOCAL IP, LLC,

Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellee

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2018-1627, 2018-1628

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-01254, IPR2016-01257.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

FOCAL IP, LLC,

Appellant

v.

YMAX CORPORATION,

2Appellee

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2018-1630, 2018-1645

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-01258, IPR2016-01260.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

FOCAL IP, LLC,

Appellant

v.

BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS, LLC,

WIDEOPENWEST FINANCE, LLC, KNOLOGY OF FLORIDA, INC., FUSION CLOUD SERVICES, LLC,

FKA BIRCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Appellees

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2018-1646, 2018-1647

3Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-01261, IPR2016-01262.

JUDGMENT

HANNA MADBAK, Siber Law LLP, New York, NY, and JOHN P. MURPHY, Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort Worth, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by BRENT N. BUMGARDNER.

CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH TYSON, Duane Morris LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellees WideOpenWest Finance, LLC, Knology of Florida, Inc. also represented by PATRICK D. MCPHERSON. SARAH J. GUSKE, Baker Botts LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee Cisco Systems, Inc. and represented appellee Bright House Networks, LLC. Also represented by WAYNE O. STACY. JOSEPH J. RICHETTI, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee YMax Corporation. Also represented by ALEXANDER DAVID WALDEN; K. LEE MARSHALL, San Francisco, CA. KYLE L. ELLIOTT, Spencer Fane LLP, Kansas City, MO, for appellee Fusion Cloud Services, LLC. Also represented by JASPAL SINGH HARE, Plano, TX. KATHERINE TWOMEY ALLEN, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by SCOTT R. MCINTOSH, JOSEPH H. HUNT; THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH

4MATAL, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 20, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Focal IP, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 18-1627 (Fed. Cir. June 20, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1627-20190620
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1627-20190620

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.