Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Pacific Biosciences of CA v. ITC, No. 18-1587 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1587
Decided
February 12, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,

Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,

OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

METRICHOR, LTD.,

Intervenors

2018-1587

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1032.

JUDGMENT

EDWARD R. REINES, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by BRIAN CHANG, DEREK C. WALTER; ROBERT T. VLASIS, III, Washington, DC. LUCY GRACE D. NOYOLA, Office of the General Counsel,

2United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON.

STEPHEN M. HASH, Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for intervenors. Also represented by SAMONEH KADIVAR, PUNEET KOHLI; MICHAEL HAWES, Houston, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 12, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Pacific Biosciences of CA v. ITC, No. 18-1587 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1587-20190212
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1587-20190212

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.