Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., No. 18-1499 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 19, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1499
Decided
September 19, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., RUCKUS WIRELESS,

INC., NETGEAR, INC.,

Appellees

2018-1499, 2018-1500, 2018-1503, 2018-1984

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-01389, IPR2016-01391, IPR2016-01397, IPR2016-01399, IPR2017-00719.

JUDGMENT

FRANK A. ANGILERI, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, MI, argued for appellant. Also represented by THOMAS A. LEWRY, MARC LORELLI, CHRISTOPHER C. SMITH.

JONATHAN STUART KAGAN, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for all appellees. Appellee Juniper Networks, Inc. also represented by MICHAEL RICHARD FLEMING.

2MATTHEW YUNGWIRTH, Duane Morris LLP, Atlanta, GA, for appellees Ruckus Wireless, Inc., NETGEAR, Inc. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH TYSON, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (TARANTO, CLEVENGER, and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 19, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., No. 18-1499 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 19, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1499-20190919
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1499-20190919

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error