Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Strikeforce Technologies, Inc v. Secureauth Corporation, No. 18-1470 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 19, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1470
Decided
February 19, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SECUREAUTH CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

2018-1470

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:17-cv-04314-JAKSK, Judge John A. Kronstadt.

JUDGMENT

DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by SAMUEL LAWRENCE BRENNER, Boston, MA; STEVEN PEPE, KEVIN JOHN POST, JOSEF B. SCHENKER, New York, NY. JEREMY ANGUS ANAPOL, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Irvine, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JON W. GURKA, STEPHEN W. LARSON; GABRIEL BELL, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 19, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Strikeforce Technologies, Inc v. Secureauth Corporation, No. 18-1470 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 19, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1470-20190219
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1470-20190219

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.