Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Technology Properties Limited v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., No. 18-1439 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1439
Decided
February 6, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC,

PHOENIX DIGITAL SOLUTIONS LLC, PATRIOT

SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., FUTUREWEI

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., HUAWEI DEVICE CO.,

LTD., HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., HUAWEI

TECHNOLOGIES USA INC., ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE USA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,

LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG ELECTRONICS

U.S.A., INC., NINTENDO CO., LTD., NINTENDO OF

AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2018-1439, 2018-1440, 2018-1441, 2018-1444, 2018-1445

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Nos. 3:12-cv-03865-VC, 3:12-cv-03876-VC, 3:12-cv-03877-VC, 3:12-cv-03880-VC, 3:12-cv-03881-VC, Judge Vince Chhabria.

JUDGMENT

2DENISE MARIE DE MORY, Bunsow De Mory LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by HENRY CHARLES BUNSOW, AARON HAND, LAUREN NICOLE ROBINSON.

MARK D. FOWLER, DLA Piper LLP (US), East Palo Alto, CA, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. also represented by ERIK RYAN FUEHRER, AARON WAINSCOAT; STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, ROBERT CHEN WILLIAMS, San Diego, CA; JAMES MARTIN HEINTZ, Reston, VA. TIMOTHY C. BICKHAM, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Futurewei Technologies, Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA Inc., Huawei Technologies USA Inc. Also represented by MICHAEL ELI FLYNN-O'BRIEN, San Francisco, CA. CHARLES M. MCMAHON, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Chicago, IL, for defendants-appellees ZTE Corporation, ZTE USA, Inc. Also represented by BRIAN ANDREW JONES; JAY REIZISS, Washington, DC. CHRISTIAN A. CHU, Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. Also represented by JOSEPH B. WARDEN, Wilmington, DE. STEPHEN R. SMITH, Cooley LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees Nintendo Co., Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc. Also represented by MATTHEW J. BRIGHAM, Palo Alto, CA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

3ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 6, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Technology Properties Limited v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., No. 18-1439 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1439-20190206
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1439-20190206

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.