Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Cascades Streaming v. BIG TEN Network, LLC, No. 18-1424 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1424
Decided
January 16, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CASCADES STREAMING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BIG TEN NETWORK, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2018-1424

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:13-cv-01455, Judge Gary Feinerman.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT GREENSPOON, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MARTIN B. PAVANE, Cozen O'Connor, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by DARREN SCOTT MOGIL, ADAM J. SCHLATNER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 16, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cascades Streaming v. BIG TEN Network, LLC, No. 18-1424 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1424-20190116
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1424-20190116

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error