Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Enventure Global Technology v. Mohawk Energy Ltd., No. 18-1356 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 15, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1356
Decided
January 15, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ENVENTURE GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY INC.,

Appellant

v.

MOHAWK ENERGY LTD.,

Appellee

2018-1356

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-00954.

JUDGMENT

JONNA N. SUMMERS, Porter & Hedges, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by JONATHAN PIERCE.

JASON SAUNDERS, Arnold, Knobloch & Saunders, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by GORDON ARNOLD, CHRISTOPHER MCKEON.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, SCHALL, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Enventure Global Technology v. Mohawk Energy Ltd., No. 18-1356 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 15, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1356-20190115
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1356-20190115

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error