Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Cosmo Technologies Limited v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., No. 18-1335 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1335
Decided
January 14, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

COSMO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, VALEANT

PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL,

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS LUXEMBOURG

S.A.R.L.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2018-1335

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:15-cv-00164-LPS, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark.

COSMO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, VALEANT

PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL,

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS LUXEMBOURG

S.A.R.L.,

Plaintiffs -Appellants

v.

2ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2018-1336

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:15-cv-00193-LPS, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark.

JUDGMENT

STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all plaintiffs-appellants. Plaintiffs-appellants Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Valeant Pharmaceuticals Luxembourg S.a.r.l. also represented by IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV; MELANIE R. RUPERT, New York, NY. GARY N. FRISCHLING, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant Cosmo Technologies Limited. Also represented by YITE JOHN LU. WILLIAM M. JAY, Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. Also represented by JOHN T. BENNETT, JOSHUA JAMES BONE, SAMUEL SHERRY, Boston, MA; ELIZABETH HOLLAND, NAOMI BIRBACH, New York, NY. JASON MURATA, Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee Alvogen Pine Brook, LLC. Also represented by MATTHEW BECKER, Hartford, CT.

3THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 14, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cosmo Technologies Limited v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., No. 18-1335 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1335-20190114
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1335-20190114

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.