Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran LLC, No. 18-1240 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 7, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1240
Decided
February 7, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ABS GLOBAL, INC.,

Appellant

v.

INGURAN LLC,

Appellee

2018-1240

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-00927.

JUDGMENT

STEVEN J. HOROWITZ, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR.; JEFFREY PAUL KUSHAN, Washington, DC. ZE-WEN JULIUS CHEN, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by KIRT S. O'NEILL, San Antonio, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 7, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran LLC, No. 18-1240 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 7, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1240-20190207
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1240-20190207

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.