Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 18-1197 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 15, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1197
Decided
January 15, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VIRNETX INC., LEIDOS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant

APPLE INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

2018-1197

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:10-cv-00417-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY A. LAMKEN, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all plaintiffs-appellees. Plaintiff-appellee VirnetX Inc. also represented by JAMES A. BARTA, RAYINER HASHEM, MICHAEL GREGORY PATTILLO, JR.; ALLISON MILEO GORSUCH, New York, NY; BRADLEY WAYNE CALDWELL, JASON DODD CASSADY, JOHN AUSTIN CURRY, Caldwell Cassady & Curry, Dallas, TX.

2DONALD SANTOS URRABAZO, Urrabazo Law, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee Leidos, Inc. Also represented by ANDY TINDEL, Mann, Tindel & Thompson, Tyler, TX. WILLIAM F. LEE, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by REBECCA A. BACT, MARK CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, LAUREN B. FLETCHER; THOMAS GREGORY SPRANKLING, Palo Alto, CA; BRITTANY BLUEITT AMADI, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 18-1197 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 15, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1197-20190115
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1197-20190115

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.