Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Masa LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 18-1160 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1160
Decided
November 13, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MASA LLC,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Appellee

2018-1160

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-00748.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT M. EVANS, JR., Stinson Leonard Street LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellant. Also represented by KYLE G. GOTTUSO, Senniger Power LLP, St. Louis, MO. ANGELA DAWN MITCHELL, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by RYAN SCHLETZBAUM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Masa LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 18-1160 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1160-20181113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1160-20181113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.