Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Product Association Tech. v. Clique Brands Inc., No. 18-1090 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 5, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1090
Decided
October 5, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PRODUCT ASSOCIATION TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CLIQUE BRANDS INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2018-1090

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:17-cv-05463-GW-PJW, Judge George H. Wu.

JUDGMENT

JAY B. JOHNSON, Kizzia Johnson PLLC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. YASSER EL-GAMAL, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, Costa Mesa, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 5, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Product Association Tech. v. Clique Brands Inc., No. 18-1090 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 5, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1090-20181005
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1090-20181005

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.