Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

MAX Sound Corporation v. Google LLC, No. 18-1039 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1039
Decided
March 12, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MAX SOUND CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

VEDANTI SYSTEMS LIMITED,

Plaintiff

v.

GOOGLE LLC, YOUTUBE, LLC, ON2

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

GRANT & EISENHOFER, P.A.,

Defendant 2018-1039

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:14-cv-04412-EJD, Judge Edward J. Davila.

JUDGMENT

ERIC WILLIAM BUETHER, Buether Joe & Carpenter LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by BLAKE WILLIAM BUETHER.

2ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Jones Day, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Washington, DC; SANJIV PRAKASH LAUD, Minneapolis, MN; JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LINN and MOORE,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 12, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

MAX Sound Corporation v. Google LLC, No. 18-1039 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-18-1039-20190312
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-18-1039-20190312

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error