Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Umbanet, Inc. v. Epsilon Data Management, LLC, No. 17-2556 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2556
Decided
December 10, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

UMBANET, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

EPSILON DATA MANAGEMENT, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2017-2556

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:16-cv-00682-JRG, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

JUDGMENT

BRIAN BECK, Spence, P.C., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM CORY SPENCE.

PRATIK A. SHAH, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ZE-WEN JULIUS CHEN; CHARLES EVERINGHAM, IV, Longview, TX.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY and

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Umbanet, Inc. v. Epsilon Data Management, LLC, No. 17-2556 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-2556-20181210
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-2556-20181210

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error