Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Stryker Corporation v. Zimmer, Inc., No. 17-2541 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2541
Decided
December 10, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER PUERTO

RICO, LTD., STRYKER SALES CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER SURGICAL, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants

2017-2541

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan in No. 1:10-cv-01223-RJJ, Judge Robert J. Jonker.

JUDGMENT

SHARON HWANG, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by DEBORAH LAUGHTON, STEPHANIE SAMZ. SETH P. WAXMAN, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by THOMAS SAUNDERS; THOMAS GREGORY SPRANKLING, Palo Alto, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Stryker Corporation v. Zimmer, Inc., No. 17-2541 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-2541-20181210
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-2541-20181210

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.