Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Daneshvar v. Kipke, No. 17-2515 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2515
Decided
November 19, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

EUGENE D. DANESHVAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DARYL R. KIPKE, NEURONEXUS

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2017-2515

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 2:13-cv-13096-SJMAPP, Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM ALCIATI, Gardella Grace PA, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by GREG GARDELLA.

J. MICHAEL HUGET, Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Ann Arbor, MI, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by SARAH E. WAIDELICH.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, WALLACH, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 19, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Daneshvar v. Kipke, No. 17-2515 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-2515-20181119
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-2515-20181119

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error