Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

American Vehicular Sciences v. Unified Patents Inc., No. 17-2307 (Fed. Cir. June 19, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2307
Decided
June 19, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit AMERICAN VEHICULAR SCIENCES LLC,

Appellant

v.

UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,

Appellee

2017-2307

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-00364.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT GREENSPOON, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by GREGORY J. GONSALVES, Gonsalves Law Firm, Falls Church, VA. DAVID LANGDON CAVANAUGH, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by GREGORY H. LANTIER, ANURADHA SIVARAM, JONATHAN RUDOLPH KOMINEK STROUD, DANIEL V. WILLIAMS.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and

REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 19, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

American Vehicular Sciences v. Unified Patents Inc., No. 17-2307 (Fed. Cir. June 19, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-2307-20180619
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-2307-20180619

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error