Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

MTD Products Inc. v. Iancu, No. 17-2294 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2294
Decided
February 12, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MTD PRODUCTS INC.,

Appellant

v.

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor 2017-2294

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-00219.

JUDGMENT

JOHN CIPOLLA, Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA FRIEDMAN, TRACY SCOTT JOHNSON, MARK MCDOUGALL.

PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for

2intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, PETER JOHN SAWERT.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 12, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

MTD Products Inc. v. Iancu, No. 17-2294 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-17-2294-20190212
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-2294-20190212

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.