Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Picis, Inc., No. 17-2171 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2019) — Rule 36 Judgment

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

PICIS, INC., QUADRAMED CORPORATION, N.

HARRIS COMPUTER CORP., OPTUMINSIGHT,

INC., NETSMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

PRACTICE FUSION, INC.,

Defendant

2017-2171

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:16-cv-00463-RWS, 6:16-cv-00465-RWS, 6:16-cv-00466-RWS, 6:16-cv-00467-RWS, 6:16-cv-00468-RWS, 6:16-cv-00470-RWS, 6:16-cv-00471-RWS, 6:16-cv-00472-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

JUDGMENT

BRETT MANGRUM, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by RYAN S. LOVELESS, JAMES ETHERIDGE.

2HARNAIK S. KAHLON, Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila, Chicago, IL, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendant-appellee Netsmart Technologies, Inc. also represented by ASHLEY TAYLOR CORBITT. MICHAEL A. ALBERT, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, MA, for defendants-appellees Picis, Inc., QuadraMed Corporation, N. Harris Computer Corp. Also represented by HUNTER D. KEETON, MARIE MCKIERNAN, AUSTIN STEELMAN.

PETER J. CHASSMAN, Reed Smith, Houston, TX, for defendant-appellee OptumInsight, Inc.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Cite this opinion