Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Vedanti Licensing Limited v. Google LLC, No. 17-2169 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2169
Decided
March 12, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit VEDANTI LICENSING LIMITED,

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Appellee

2017-2169

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-00212, IPR2016-00215.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT M. ASHER, Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by KERRY L. TIMBERS. GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL; JON WRIGHT, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LINN and MOORE,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 12, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Vedanti Licensing Limited v. Google LLC, No. 17-2169 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-17-2169-20190312
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-2169-20190312

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error