Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Seadrill Americas, Inc. v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater, No. 17-2126 (Fed. Cir. June 13, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2126
Decided
June 13, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SEADRILL AMERICAS, INC., SEADRILL GULF

OPERATIONS AURIGA, LLC, SEADRILL GULF

OPERATIONS VELA, LLC, SEADRILL GULF

OPERATIONS NEPTUNE, LLC,

Appellants

v.

TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER

DRILLING, INC.,

Appellee

2017-2126, 2017-2127, 2017-2129

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-01929, IPR2015-01989, IPR2015-01990.

JUDGMENT

MATTHEW G. REEVES, Locke Lord LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellants. Also represented by CHARLES BAKER, DANIEL G. NGUYEN.

CHARLES BRUCE WALKER, JR., Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellee. Also repre-

2sented by MARK FRANCIS EBERHARD; STEPHANIE DEBROW, MARK T. GARRETT, WILLIAM ANDREW LIDDELL, Austin, TX; JONATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Seadrill Americas, Inc. v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater, No. 17-2126 (Fed. Cir. June 13, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-2126-20180613
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-2126-20180613

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.