Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Robert Bosch Tool Corporation v. ITC, No. 17-1883 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1883
Decided
February 12, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ROBERT BOSCH TOOL CORPORATION, ROBERT

BOSCH GMBH,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

SAWSTOP, LLC, SAWSTOP HOLDING LLC,

Intervenors

2017-1883

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-965.

JUDGMENT

MARK A. HANNEMANN, Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants. Also represented by PATRICK ROBERT COLSHER, ERIC SEBASTIAN LUCAS, THOMAS R. MAKIN, JOSEPH MATTHEW PURCELL, JR.

ROBERT JOHN NEEDHAM, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washing-

2ton, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON.

RAYMOND N. NIMROD, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for intervenors. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 12, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Robert Bosch Tool Corporation v. ITC, No. 17-1883 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1883-20180212
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1883-20180212

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error