Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Graphic Packaging Intl. v. Inline Packaging, LLC, No. 17-1776 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1776
Decided
February 8, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, LLC,

Appellant

v.

INLINE PACKAGING, LLC,

Appellee

2017-1776

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-01609.

JUDGMENT

BARRY J. HERMAN, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP, Baltimore, MD, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHRISTINE H. DUPRIEST, Washington, DC; JAMES FREDERICK VAUGHAN, Atlanta, GA. CHAD E. ZIEGLER, Neustel Law Offices, Ltd., Fargo, ND, argued for appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL S. NEUSTEL.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 8, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Graphic Packaging Intl. v. Inline Packaging, LLC, No. 17-1776 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1776-20180208
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1776-20180208

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.